Home » Megyn Kelly’s ‘Not A Pedophile’ Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein Is As Repulsive As It Sounds
News

Megyn Kelly’s ‘Not A Pedophile’ Defense Of Jeffrey Epstein Is As Repulsive As It Sounds

Megyn Kelly is coming under fire for comments she made Wednesday on her podcast where she attempted to downplay Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse.

Kelly was interviewing conservative journalist Batya Ungar-Sargon when she made the dubious claim about the disgraced financier, which she attributed to “somebody very, very close to this case who is in a position to know virtually everything. Not everything, but virtually everything.”

Kelly said the unnamed source told her they didn’t think Epstein was a pedophile, just “into the barely legal type, like, he liked 15-year-old girls.”

She elaborated on what that meant, and you are forgiven if you feel like you need a bath after reading her rationale (which she insisted were “facts,” not an “excuse”).

Kelly said her source said Epstein “wasn’t into, like, 8-year-olds. But he liked the very young teen types that could pass for even younger than they were, but would look legal to a passerby.”

She said that she believed Epstein was a real pedophile for years and admitted that “it wasn’t until we heard from Pam Bondi that they had tens of thousands of videos of alleged — forgive me, they used to call it kiddie porn, now they call it child sexual abuse material — on his computer that for the first time, I thought, ‘Oh, no, he was an actual pedophile.’”

“I mean, only a pedophile gets off on young children abuse videos. She’s never clarified it, I don’t know whether it’s true,” she added. “I have to be honest, I don’t really trust Pam Bondi’s word on the Epstein matters anymore.”

Kelly admitted she doesn’t know what’s true about Epstein, but noted that “we have yet to see anybody come forward and say, ‘I was under 10, I was under 14 when I first came within his purview.’”

She then engaged in a bit of hairsplitting over the definition of pedophilia.

“You can say that’s a distinction without a difference. I think there is a difference. There’s a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?” she said, before admitting the obvious.

“Whatever. It’s sick. Every time we start talking about Epstein, it makes your skin crawl. You’re right. The whole thing is just disgusting,” she said.

You can read a transcript of the complete exchange at Media Matters for America and watch a clip below.

Megyn Kelly: “I know somebody very close to this case…Jeffrey Epstein, in this person’s view, was not a pedophile…He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…He wasn’t into like 8 year olds…There’s a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old.” pic.twitter.com/a7wmT3BRJU

— Republican Accountability (@AccountableGOP) November 13, 2025

Despite Kelly calling Epstein “disgusting,” her hairsplitting on underage sex abuse was heavily criticized on social media.

This is career-ending for Megyn Kelly. 15 year olds are CHILDREN. They can’t drive. They can’t see rated R movies. But disgusting 50 year old men should be allowed to rape them? Goodbye. Forever. https://t.co/Y0JCfhoPfu

— Ally Sammarco (@Ally_Sammarco) November 13, 2025

Megyn Kelly has gone from fighting sexual harassment by Roger Ailes to defending underage rape, pedophilia & the sex trafficking of minors. Her family must be so proud https://t.co/hyiaRv7Icb

— Erin Overbey (@erinoverbey) November 13, 2025

Kelly conveniently omitted confirmed sex trafficked/abused victims age 14…to minimize sex predator depravity or for her male audience?
A parent or anyone “less disturbed” by sex abused “pubescent” vs prepubescent girls is ‘splaining OR revealing a teen sex predator’s view. pic.twitter.com/rtgv6jMzdP

— Dr Mac PsyD 💙 (@WizWackaTroll) November 13, 2025

Holy crap, the LOOOONG silence after Megyn Kelly spends 2 minutes explaining to Batya why maybe Jeffrey Epstein is “not a pedophile”:

MEGYN KELLY: As for Epstein, I’ve said this before, but just as a reminder, I do know somebody very, very close to this case who is in a position… pic.twitter.com/Uk7QiIhSoh

— Tommy moderna-vaX-Topher (@tommyxtopher) November 13, 2025

MAGA Megyn Kelly is a vile woman who should’ve been cancelled LONG ago. These victims were coerced into prostitution and groomed by men 4 and 5 times their age. 15 year olds aren’t “barely legal,” they are children. PERIOD. https://t.co/ka5R9pt8eC

— Lynnez 🌊♥️🇺🇸 🐸Rib Gone Rogue (@RibGoneRogue) November 13, 2025

So we have Tucker saying wanting to kill Hitler was bad and Megyn Kelly saying Epstein wasn’t *technically* a pedophile, so great job to everyone who spent the last few weeks carrying water for them.

— Mike Nelson (@mikenelson586) November 13, 2025

Good God @megynkelly is as disgusting of a pedo protector as the rest of them. Doesn’t she have daughters? She’d be ok with a 50 year old man and her 15 year old daughter… passing her around for money like she’s nothing but for blow jobs and sodomy for a bunch of old rich men🤬 https://t.co/q9JhkjpQyI

— Lucy🇺🇸🦅💙🌊🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈 (@littlepagelc) November 13, 2025

So @megynkelly thinks it’s fine to sex traffic girls as long as they’re 15 or older? These people are fucking sick.

— Andrew—#IAmTheResistance (@AmoneyResists) November 13, 2025

Megyn Kelly going with “ackshually it’s called ephebophile” and defending pedophile sex trafficking pests is a complete mask off moment https://t.co/yFjbRUIOtw

— Fiona Small (@FionaSmall) November 13, 2025

Megyn Kelly says trafficking & abusing young teenage girls is not pedophilia after all—it’s “barely legal.”
“we have yet to see anyone coming forward to say I was under 10”
“he was into the barely legal type… he liked 15-year-olds”
“There’s a difference between 15 and 5, you… pic.twitter.com/HpFe5S0du0

— Jim Stewartson, Antifascist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🏴☠️🇺🇸 (@jimstewartson) November 13, 2025

Newsletter